What is campaign finance disclosure in federal elections?
Campaign finance disclosure in federal elections is the mandatory public financial reporting system created by the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). Under 52 U.S.C. Section 30103, any political committee -- including a presidential candidate's authorized committee -- that receives contributions or makes expenditures exceeding $1,000 must register with the Federal Election Commission. Under 52 U.S.C. Section 30104, registered committees must file periodic financial reports disclosing contributions above $200 (with each donor's name, address, occupation, employer, date, and amount) and expenditures above $200 (with payee name, address, date, amount, and purpose). The FEC publishes all filings in a searchable public database at fec.gov. The Supreme Court sustained FECA's disclosure provisions in Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), holding that the government's substantial interests in informing voters and deterring corruption outweigh the marginal burden public reporting places on political association. In Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), eight of nine Justices upheld the disclosure and disclaimer requirements applicable to electioneering communications. For the 2028 presidential election, every registered campaign committee and qualifying outside group will file regular disclosure reports that become publicly searchable at fec.gov.
Campaign finance disclosure is the public-reporting obligation that makes federal campaign finance law enforceable and transparent. The Federal Election Campaign Act establishes the disclosure framework in two statutory provisions. First, 52 U.S.C. Section 30103 requires every political committee to register with the FEC by filing a statement of organization. A 'political committee' is defined at 52 U.S.C. Section 30101(4) as any committee, club, association, or group of persons that receives contributions of more than $1,000 or makes expenditures of more than $1,000 during a calendar year, and includes any authorized committee of a federal candidate. A presidential campaign committee must therefore register with the FEC before it receives or spends more than $1,000. The registration statement must identify the committee's name, address, the candidate it supports, the names and addresses of all officers and custodians of the committee's records, the name and address of the committee's bank depository, and the name and address of the committee's treasurer. A treasurer is required by 52 U.S.C. Section 30102(a); the treasurer must sign all periodic financial reports and is responsible for the committee's recordkeeping obligations. The FEC uses the registration statement to open the committee's public file, assign it a committee identification number, and track its subsequent financial reports.
Second, 52 U.S.C. Section 30104 requires registered political committees to file periodic financial reports with the FEC disclosing both what money came in and how it was spent. Each report must disclose: every contribution received from a single source in aggregate above $200 during the calendar year, including the contributor's full name, mailing address, occupation, employer, date of each contribution, and amount; the total amount of contributions received below the $200 threshold (disclosed as an aggregate without identifying individual donors); and every expenditure of more than $200, including the full name and mailing address of the payee, the date, the amount, and the stated purpose. The $200 itemization threshold means that a contributor who gives $200 or less in total to a committee over the entire calendar year does not appear by name in the public record -- only the aggregate amount of unitemized small contributions is reported. The threshold is set by statute and is not adjusted for inflation. FECA also requires campaigns to maintain records of all contributions above $50 and to make those records available to the FEC for audit; the FEC may audit and investigate compliance, and civil penalties apply for knowing failure to report.
The reporting schedule for presidential campaign committees under 52 U.S.C. Section 30104(a) is structured to provide regular public information, with accelerated disclosure as elections approach. In years without a federal election, authorized committees file quarterly reports due 15 days after the close of each calendar quarter: April 15, July 15, October 15, and January 31. In election years, quarterly reports are supplemented by pre-election reports filed no later than 12 days before any primary, convention, or general election, and a post-general-election report filed within 30 days after the general election. The pre-election report captures all activity through the 20th day before the election. Any contribution of $1,000 or more received in the final 20 days before an election -- after the pre-election report's cutoff -- must be disclosed in a separate 48-hour report filed within 48 hours of receipt. This last-minute reporting requirement ensures that large donations in the closing weeks of the 2028 campaign become part of the public record before Election Day, not weeks later when the regular post-election report would otherwise capture them. Large independent expenditures -- spending by super PACs and other outside groups on 2028 presidential advocacy that is not coordinated with a campaign -- are subject to their own accelerated disclosure: expenditures of $10,000 or more at any time, and expenditures of $1,000 or more in the 20 days before an election, trigger 24-hour reports.
The Supreme Court has sustained FECA's disclosure requirements against First Amendment challenge in two landmark decisions. In Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), the Court upheld the disclosure provisions, holding that the government's substantial interests in providing voters with information about how campaigns are funded and in deterring actual and apparent corruption outweigh the marginal burden that public reporting imposes on political association. The Court acknowledged that disclosure can expose contributors to harassment and retaliation in some circumstances; it held that committees or groups who can demonstrate a 'reasonable probability' that disclosure would subject contributors to threats or reprisals may seek an exemption from the FEC on an as-applied basis, but that the ordinary case does not meet that standard. The disclosure framework itself was sustained. In Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), eight of nine Justices -- every member of the Court except Justice Thomas -- upheld the disclosure and disclaimer requirements applicable to electioneering communications under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. The Citizens United majority reasoned that disclosure serves the informational interest identified in Buckley and enables shareholders and citizens to evaluate the political positions of corporations and organizations whose spending they can now track. This near-unanimous constitutional endorsement makes the disclosure framework among the most durable features of federal campaign finance law -- more durable than contribution limits (upheld in Buckley with some dissent) or expenditure restrictions (struck in Buckley and Citizens United).
For the 2028 presidential election, every presidential campaign committee must register with the FEC and file quarterly and pre-election financial reports beginning when the committee crosses the $1,000 activity threshold. Each report becomes publicly searchable at fec.gov, typically within days of filing; electronic filings appear in the database in near-real time. Super PACs that support 2028 presidential candidates must also register and disclose all contributions of $200 or more, making super PAC funding fully transparent to researchers, journalists, and opposing campaigns. By contrast, 501(c)(4) 'dark money' organizations that do not make expenditures qualifying as electioneering communications under BCRA may not be required to disclose their general donor lists to the FEC, though donors of $1,000 or more are disclosed when the 501(c)(4) does run electioneering communications. The 2028 presidential cycle is expected to be the most expensive in U.S. history, with billions of dollars in combined campaign, party, super PAC, and dark-money spending. The public record of who funds which candidates and committees -- and how that money is spent -- will be generated continuously throughout the cycle under the disclosure system FECA has maintained since 1976.
Related: What is the Federal Election Commission (FEC)? (the agency that collects, publishes, and enforces all disclosure filings) | What is the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA)? (the statute that created the disclosure framework at Sections 30103 and 30104) | What is a contribution limit? (disclosed contributions are also subject to FECA per-election caps) | What is dark money? (501(c)(4) organizations that do not fully disclose their donor lists) | What is an electioneering communication? (subject to its own accelerated disclosure requirements under BCRA) | What is Buckley v. Valeo? (upheld FECA disclosure requirements against First Amendment challenge) | What is Citizens United? (eight Justices upheld electioneering-communication disclosure requirements) | What is a bundler? (bundlers recruit disclosed contributions from multiple donors, each counted individually) | What is a super PAC? (super PACs disclose all donors of $200 or more in periodic FEC reports) | When is the 2028 election?
Related questions
What is campaign finance disclosure and why does it exist?
What donor information must campaigns disclose to the FEC?
How often must a presidential campaign file financial reports with the FEC?
What is the 48-hour reporting requirement in campaign finance?
Where can I find campaign finance disclosures for 2028 presidential candidates?
Get the 2028 race by email
One short alert when the 2028 race actually changes - a candidate enters or drops out, the rules firm up, the polls move. No spam.
Related explainers
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is the independent federal agency that administers and enforces campaign finance law for all federal elections, including 2028. It was created by the Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-443), signed October 15, 1974, in response to campaign finance abuses exposed during the Watergate investigation. The FEC is run by six commissioners (no more than three from the same party), appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. All 2028 presidential campaign committees must register with the FEC, and all contributions and expenditures above reporting thresholds must be publicly disclosed at fec.gov.
The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA, Pub. L. 92-225), originally signed by President Nixon on February 7, 1972, is the foundational federal statute regulating the financing of federal elections. Its landmark 1974 amendments (Pub. L. 93-443, signed by President Ford on October 15, 1974) created the Federal Election Commission, established individual contribution limits of $1,000 per candidate per election, set PAC limits at $5,000 per candidate per election, created the presidential public funding program, and set candidate expenditure limits. In Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), the Supreme Court upheld contribution limits and disclosure requirements but struck down expenditure limits as unconstitutional restrictions on First Amendment speech. FECA -- as amended by the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2002) and interpreted through Citizens United (2010) -- remains the primary legal framework governing 2028 presidential campaign finance.
A contribution limit in federal campaign finance is the maximum dollar amount that any individual or political committee may give to a federal candidate's authorized committee in a single election, as set by the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) at 52 U.S.C. Section 30116. Contribution limits are the defining characteristic of 'hard money': only regulated, limit-compliant donations may be given directly to a candidate's campaign. FECA's 1974 amendments established the original per-election limits -- $1,000 per election for individuals and $5,000 per election for multi-candidate PACs -- figures analyzed and upheld in Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976). The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA, Pub. L. 107-155) raised the individual limit to $2,000 per election and added inflation indexing via the Consumer Price Index, so the individual limit increases each election cycle; the multi-candidate PAC limit of $5,000 per election was set by statute and has not been inflation-adjusted. A 'per election' means each primary election and the general election are counted separately, so a contributor eligible for the current individual limit may give up to that amount to a candidate in the primary and up to that same amount again in the general. In McCutcheon v. FEC, 572 U.S. 185 (2014), the Supreme Court struck the former aggregate biennial limits on total individual contributions across all candidates and committees, but left all per-election contribution limits to individual candidates fully intact. For 2028, every direct donation to a presidential campaign committee must comply with FECA's per-election contribution limits; current cycle amounts should be verified at fec.gov.
Dark money is a colloquial term for political spending from nonprofit organizations -- primarily 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations and 501(c)(6) trade associations -- that are not required under federal law to disclose their donors publicly in Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings. Unlike super PACs, which must report all donors above disclosure thresholds in periodic FEC filings, a 501(c)(4) that makes independent expenditures or funds electioneering communications is only required to disclose individuals who contribute $1,000 or more specifically earmarked for a particular electioneering communication (52 U.S.C. Section 30104(f)) or $250 or more earmarked for a specific independent expenditure (52 U.S.C. Section 30104(g)); the organization's general donor list is not publicly disclosed. Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), removed restrictions on corporations, unions, and nonprofits making unlimited independent political expenditures, expanding the scope of organizations that can engage in dark-money spending. In Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, 594 U.S. 595 (2021), the Supreme Court struck down California's requirement that nonprofits disclose their major donors to the state attorney general, holding 6-3 that compelled donor disclosure imposes a significant burden on First Amendment rights of association. For the 2028 presidential election, dark-money organizations operating under the existing legal framework may fund unlimited independent expenditures and electioneering communications without their donors appearing in publicly searchable FEC filings.
See the live 2028 candidate trackerAll 2028 election questions