What is a 501(c)(4) organization?
A 501(c)(4) organization is a tax-exempt nonprofit social welfare organization under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. Section 501(c)(4)). Unlike a PAC or super PAC, a 501(c)(4) does not have to publicly disclose its donors -- a feature that makes it the primary vehicle for 'dark money' in federal elections. A 501(c)(4) may engage in political activity, including making unlimited independent expenditures and donating to super PACs, provided that political activity is not its primary purpose. Because the 501(c)(4) itself is not required to name its donors publicly while a super PAC it contributes to must disclose the 501(c)(4) as a donor, the combination creates an indirect funding channel in which the original human donors remain hidden from public view.
A 501(c)(4) organization is a nonprofit entity granted tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. Section 501(c)(4)), which covers 'civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.' The Internal Revenue Service interprets 'exclusively' to mean 'primarily': a 501(c)(4) may engage in political activity -- voter registration, voter mobilization, issue advocacy, lobbying, and political advertising -- as long as political activity does not constitute its primary purpose. The IRS applies a facts-and-circumstances test, examining the organization's total activities, to determine whether it qualifies. A 501(c)(4) is distinct from a 501(c)(3) charitable organization (which may not engage in political campaign activity at all and is subject to strict lobbying limits), from a 527 political organization (which exists explicitly to influence elections and is subject to its own IRS and FEC disclosure rules), and from a PAC or super PAC (which are registered with the FEC and required to publicly disclose donors above reporting thresholds).
The key legal development that expanded 501(c)(4) political activity in federal elections was Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (January 21, 2010). The plaintiff in that case -- Citizens United -- was itself a 501(c)(4) nonprofit corporation that had produced 'Hillary: The Movie,' a critical documentary about Hillary Clinton, and sought to distribute it via video-on-demand and air advertisements for it close to the 2008 primary elections. The Supreme Court held 5-4 that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations, associations, and labor unions, including nonprofit corporations. This ruling -- combined with SpeechNow.org v. FEC, 599 F.3d 686 (D.C. Circuit, March 26, 2010), which extended the same logic to contributions to groups making only independent expenditures -- enabled 501(c)(4) organizations to make unlimited independent expenditures directly from their organizational funds to advocate for or against federal candidates, provided those expenditures are not coordinated with any campaign.
The 'dark money' mechanism arises from the intersection of 501(c)(4) donor privacy and the FEC's disclosure requirements for political spending. When an individual donates money to a 501(c)(4), that donation does not appear in any publicly searchable federal disclosure database. The 501(c)(4) may then contribute to a super PAC -- that contribution is disclosed by the super PAC in its FEC filings and is publicly searchable at fec.gov, showing the 501(c)(4) organization's name and the amount given. However, the names of the individuals who funded the 501(c)(4) are not visible in the super PAC's FEC filing. The flow is: individual donor (name not publicly disclosed) -- 501(c)(4) organization (its name disclosed on the super PAC's FEC report) -- super PAC -- election spending (disclosed). A researcher examining the super PAC's filings can see that a named 501(c)(4) organization donated a specified amount, but cannot determine from public FEC records which specific individuals funded that 501(c)(4).
501(c)(4) organizations must comply with several legal requirements. They must file a Form 8976 electronic notice with the IRS within 60 days of organizing (a requirement introduced in 2016). They file an annual Form 990, which is publicly available on the IRS website, but donor identification information filed with the IRS is kept confidential by federal law (26 U.S.C. Section 6104(b)). For federal election spending specifically, a 501(c)(4) that makes electioneering communications -- broadcast, cable, or satellite ads clearly identifying a federal candidate within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of a general election -- must file a disclosure report with the FEC under 52 U.S.C. Section 30104(f), identifying the ad, the candidate referenced, and each person who gave $1,000 or more to fund that specific communication. A 501(c)(4) that makes independent expenditures above $250 in a calendar year must report those expenditures to the FEC under 52 U.S.C. Section 30104(g). These FEC filings disclose the spending itself; they do not require disclosure of all general donors to the 501(c)(4). In Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, 594 U.S. 595 (2021), the Supreme Court held 6-3 that California's requirement that nonprofits disclose their major donors to state officials as a condition of charitable solicitation was unconstitutional under the First Amendment right of association, narrowing the reach of state-level disclosure requirements for 501(c)(4) donors.
For the 2028 presidential election, 501(c)(4) organizations are expected to be a significant channel for political spending by corporations, unions, and individuals who wish to influence the election while keeping their identities out of publicly searchable FEC databases. They may support or oppose 2028 candidates through independent expenditures and electioneering communications, provided political activity does not become their primary purpose. By donating to super PACs, they can channel unlimited funds into the concentrated independent-expenditure campaigns that major 2028 presidential candidates are expected to attract. All super PAC filings, including contributions received from 501(c)(4) organizations, are publicly searchable at fec.gov; 501(c)(4) spending on electioneering communications and independent expenditures is separately disclosed to the FEC. The practical effect is that voters and journalists can track the dollar amounts and the names of 501(c)(4) organizations involved in 2028 campaign spending, but not always the individual donors who funded those organizations.
Related: What is a super PAC? (where 501(c)(4)s route dark money) | What is Citizens United? (the ruling that expanded 501(c)(4) political spending) | How does presidential campaign finance work? | What is the Federal Election Commission (FEC)? | What is a PAC? (traditional political action committees) | What is the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA)? | What is dark money in politics? (how 501(c)(4) dark money works) | When is the 2028 election?
Related questions
What makes a 501(c)(4) different from a PAC or super PAC?
What is 'dark money' and how does a 501(c)(4) create it?
Can a 501(c)(4) make unlimited political expenditures?
Does a 501(c)(4) have to disclose anything to the FEC?
How do 501(c)(4) organizations affect the 2028 presidential election?
Get the 2028 race by email
One short alert when the 2028 race actually changes - a candidate enters or drops out, the rules firm up, the polls move. No spam.
Related explainers
Presidential campaigns raise money from individuals, PACs, and party committees under FEC rules. Major candidates typically opt out of public financing to raise and spend unlimited private funds.
A super PAC is the informal name for an 'independent expenditure-only committee' -- a political action committee that may raise and spend unlimited amounts from corporations, unions, and individuals, but may make no direct contributions to candidates or parties and may not coordinate spending with any campaign. Super PACs were created by Citizens United v. FEC (Supreme Court, January 21, 2010) and SpeechNow.org v. FEC (D.C. Circuit, March 26, 2010), confirmed by FEC Advisory Opinion 2010-11 (July 22, 2010). They are a central feature of modern presidential campaign finance, including 2028.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is the landmark Supreme Court decision holding that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations, associations, and labor unions. Decided January 21, 2010, by a 5-4 vote, it overruled Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and parts of McConnell v. FEC (2003), and is the constitutional foundation for unlimited super PAC spending in every U.S. election, including 2028.
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is the independent federal agency that administers and enforces campaign finance law for all federal elections, including 2028. It was created by the Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-443), signed October 15, 1974, in response to campaign finance abuses exposed during the Watergate investigation. The FEC is run by six commissioners (no more than three from the same party), appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. All 2028 presidential campaign committees must register with the FEC, and all contributions and expenditures above reporting thresholds must be publicly disclosed at fec.gov.
A PAC -- political action committee -- is a political committee registered with the Federal Election Commission that raises money from members, employees, or the general public to donate to federal candidates and party committees or to make independent expenditures in elections. Traditional PACs were formalized by the Federal Election Campaign Act's 1974 amendments (Pub. L. 93-443) and are the foundational vehicle for organized political giving in U.S. elections. A qualifying 'multi-candidate committee' PAC may contribute up to $5,000 per candidate per election directly to a campaign -- a hard cap that has not been inflation-adjusted. PACs differ from super PACs: traditional PACs may give directly to candidates subject to these limits, while super PACs (created by Citizens United v. FEC and SpeechNow.org v. FEC in 2010) may spend unlimited amounts only as independent expenditures and may never give directly to any campaign. Both types must register with the FEC and publicly disclose their donors and spending at fec.gov.
See the live 2028 candidate trackerAll 2028 election questions