Updated June 24, 2026

Israel and the Middle East in 2028

U.S. policy toward Israel, the Palestinian question, and American engagement across the Middle East.

Why it matters in 2028

The Israel-Gaza conflict reshaped the political landscape in ways that will likely still be felt in 2028. Younger and progressive voters, Arab-American communities, and Jewish-American voters all became more attentive to candidates' positions on this issue. The question of U.S. military aid and conditions on that aid will be a significant dividing line.

The two broad approaches

How each party frames israel and the middle east

A neutral summary of each party's general governing approach. Individual 2028 candidates will differ - no nominee has been chosen yet.

Democratic approach

Democrats broadly reaffirm support for Israel's security while showing greater internal disagreement over the terms of that support than in previous cycles. A significant progressive faction supports conditioning military aid and is more explicitly critical of Israeli military operations and settlement expansion. Most of the party supports a two-state solution as the path to peace and emphasizes the protection of Palestinian civilians. There is significant and visible intraparty tension on this issue.

Republican approach

Republicans broadly offer strong and largely unconditional support for Israel, including military aid and diplomatic backing. The party tends to be skeptical of pressure on Israel over its military conduct and opposes Palestinian statehood absent security guarantees. Many Republicans frame Israel policy through the lens of fighting terrorism and regional stability. There is less visible internal dissent on this issue within the party than in previous cycles, though libertarian voices occasionally push back.