Electoral College explainer

What is the congressional district method for awarding electoral votes?

The congressional district method is a system for allocating presidential electoral votes in which two electoral votes go to the statewide popular-vote winner and one electoral vote goes to the popular-vote winner in each congressional district. Only two states -- Maine and Nebraska -- use this method. The other 48 states and the District of Columbia use a winner-take-all system in which all electoral votes go to the statewide popular-vote winner. Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution grants each state legislature plenary authority over the manner of appointing its electors, meaning states may choose either method. Maine has 4 total electoral votes (2 statewide plus one per each of its 2 congressional districts); Nebraska has 5 total electoral votes (2 statewide plus one per each of its 3 congressional districts). Because individual congressional districts in both states can lean differently from the state as a whole, both Maine and Nebraska have split their electoral votes in recent presidential elections.

Updated September 4, 2026 - U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1 -- state legislature plenary authority over manner of appointing electors, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892) -- Supreme Court upheld broad state legislative authority over elector appointment method

The congressional district method is one of two approaches states may use to allocate presidential electoral votes. Under this system, a state's electoral votes are divided into two categories: two at-large electoral votes that are awarded to whichever presidential candidate wins the state's statewide popular vote, and one electoral vote for each congressional district that is awarded to whichever candidate wins the popular vote in that district. The sum equals the state's total electoral vote allocation -- which equals the state's total congressional representation (House seats plus two Senate seats), consistent with the formula set out in Article II, Section 1 and modified by the 23rd Amendment for the District of Columbia.

The constitutional authority for this method rests on Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which provides that each state shall appoint its presidential electors 'in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.' The Supreme Court interpreted this language broadly in McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), holding that state legislatures have plenary power over the method of choosing electors and may change that method from election to election. This means no constitutional amendment is needed for a state to adopt or abandon the congressional district method; the choice belongs entirely to each state's legislature. The winner-take-all rule used in 48 states is equally a legislative choice rather than a constitutional requirement.

Maine and Nebraska are the only two states that have enacted the congressional district method. Maine has 4 total electoral votes and 2 congressional districts: the 1st District, covering the Portland area and the southern coast, and the 2nd District, covering the rural northern interior. Maine's 2 at-large electoral votes go to the statewide popular-vote winner; one district electoral vote goes to the 1st District popular-vote winner; and one district electoral vote goes to the 2nd District popular-vote winner. The 2nd District -- a largely rural and inland region -- has a political composition that differs from the 1st District and from the statewide electorate, and both districts have voted for different presidential candidates in at least one recent election, producing split electoral vote allocations.

Nebraska has 5 total electoral votes and 3 congressional districts: the 1st District, covering Lincoln and the southeast corner of the state; the 2nd District, covering the Omaha metropolitan area; and the 3rd District, covering the western and Sandhills regions. Nebraska's 2 at-large electoral votes go to the statewide popular-vote winner; one district electoral vote goes to each congressional district's winner. The 2nd District -- anchored by Omaha, a metro area with a substantial urban and suburban electorate -- is historically the most competitive district in Nebraska and has voted for a different presidential candidate than the rest of the state in recent elections, producing split results for Nebraska's 5-electoral-vote allocation.

For the 2028 presidential election, Maine's 2nd District (1 electoral vote) and Nebraska's 2nd District (1 electoral vote) are the districts most likely to receive targeted campaign attention. In a close national race, a single district electoral vote from either state could determine whether a candidate reaches the 270-electoral-vote threshold. The current 538-electoral-vote total and the associated state-by-state allocations are based on the 2020 census apportionment and govern the 2028 election; the 2030 census will produce new apportionment figures that apply beginning with the 2032 presidential election.

Related questions

What is the congressional district method for presidential elections?

The congressional district method is a state-level system for distributing presidential electoral votes in which 2 electoral votes go to the statewide popular-vote winner and 1 electoral vote goes to the winner in each congressional district. Maine (4 EV total) and Nebraska (5 EV total) are the only states using this method. All other states and D.C. use winner-take-all, in which every electoral vote goes to the statewide popular-vote winner.

Which states use the congressional district method?

Only Maine and Nebraska. Maine divides its 4 electoral votes as follows: 2 at-large statewide votes plus 1 vote each for its 1st and 2nd congressional districts. Nebraska divides its 5 electoral votes as follows: 2 at-large statewide votes plus 1 vote each for its 1st, 2nd, and 3rd congressional districts. The remaining 48 states and the District of Columbia award all electoral votes to the statewide popular-vote winner.

Is the congressional district method constitutional?

Yes. Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution gives each state legislature plenary authority to direct the manner in which its electors are appointed. In McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), the Supreme Court unanimously confirmed this broad state legislative power. No federal statute requires winner-take-all, and no constitutional amendment is needed for a state to adopt or switch away from the congressional district method.

Have Maine and Nebraska actually split their electoral votes?

Yes, both states have split their electoral votes in recent presidential elections. Maine's 2nd District (rural northern Maine) has at times voted for a different presidential candidate than the 1st District and the statewide result, producing a 3-1 split rather than a uniform 4-0 allocation. Nebraska's 2nd District (Omaha metropolitan area) has also diverged from the statewide result in recent cycles, producing a 4-1 split rather than a uniform 5-0 result. These splits are a matter of established electoral record.

Could a single district's 1 electoral vote affect the 2028 outcome?

Yes. In a scenario where the nationwide electoral vote totals are near 270, a single district electoral vote from Maine's 2nd District or Nebraska's 2nd District could be decisive. Both districts have been targeted by major-party campaigns in recent elections for exactly this reason. The congressional district method makes individual congressional district margins -- not just statewide margins -- strategically relevant in the two states that use it.

Stay ahead of 2028

Get the 2028 race by email

One short alert when the 2028 race actually changes - a candidate enters or drops out, the rules firm up, the polls move. No spam.

Keep reading

Related explainers

How does the Electoral College work?

Each state gets electoral votes equal to its congressional seats. A candidate needs 270 of 538 to win. Voters choose slates of electors who then cast the official votes in December.

Can a candidate win the popular vote but lose the presidential election?

Yes. Because the president is elected by the Electoral College, not the national popular vote, a candidate can win more total votes nationwide and still lose the election.

What is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact?

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among member states to award all of their electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote across all 50 states and the District of Columbia -- but only after states totaling at least 270 electoral votes (a majority of the 538-vote Electoral College) have enacted the compact. The threshold requirement is the central design feature: the compact explicitly does not take effect until the member states collectively control enough electoral votes to guarantee that their pledge, fulfilled by all of them at once, determines the presidency. Member states rely on their authority under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives state legislatures plenary power to direct the manner in which their electors are appointed. As of mid-2026, the compact has been enacted by multiple states but has not yet reached the 270-electoral-vote threshold and is not in effect. If and when the threshold is crossed, a 2028 candidate who wins the nationwide popular vote would receive the electoral votes of every member state -- regardless of whether that candidate carried each member state individually -- making the national popular vote total, rather than the state-by-state winner-take-all map, the operative measure of victory.

See the live 2028 candidate tracker All 2028 election questions